A. Gay households can be just as loving and supportive an environment for raising children as the straight kind. B. Human sexual choice is both unchangeable and cannot be chosen, and sexual orientation does not respond to social influences designed to lead it in a different direction. Ill. Today homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle. A. An overwhelming amount of research has been done showing that homosexuality is a political and cultural controversy, not just a legal one. B. The balance between religious freedom and nondiscrimination laws are in conflict. Conclusion
People in general believe that they deserve the rights they are granted by the government. An upstanding citizen who pays taxes and who serves his or her community and abides by the laws of the community should be afforded the rights of an American. However, not all citizens are afforded equal rights. Gay and lesbians are consistently denied rights that are typically taken for granted by the average American. Specifically, gay and lesbian couples are denied the right to marry even if they are upstanding citizens. They are held at a disadvantage solely because of their sexual orientation.
Same-sex marriage should be allowed because women and men all have the same right in society; denying same-sex marriage is a violation of freedom; same-sex couples contribute to strong family values; and allowing same-sex marriage is a way to make official a common union nowadays since homosexuality is more acceptable. There are important common features between the arguments for same-sex marriage and for those for protection of religious conscience. Although the two are pitted against each other in various disputes, the strongest features Of the case for same-sex marriage make a throng case for significant religious liberty (Becker, 2012).
Denying same-sex marriage is a violation of freedom. Although all major religions consider homosexuality a sin, gay couples claim a right beyond private behavior and participation in the social institution of civil marriage. The fight is for gay and lesbian couples to gain legal recognition, not religious recognition. Even most people against same-sex marriages agree that they do not hate gays; they just disagree with their lifestyles because of their religious belief and church affiliation (Hurwitz, 2004).
It is unfair for the government to decide what people should believe; this would be an infringement upon the right to freedom of religion (Getting, 2013). In asking the question “What’s marriage (and family) got to do with it? ” the study considers whether being married and family moderates the impact of religious predispositions on public support for same-sex marriage, legal unions and gay and lesbian couples raising children. The First Amendment of the Constitution clearly states that a person’s views or lack thereof must be protected.
Religious accommodation should protect organizations and businesses like “the wedding photographer roving personal service” related to marriage (Hurwitz, 2004). The Supreme Court’s right to marry and gay rights jurisprudence are in an untenable state. “Since the earliest Same-sex marriage cases in the nineteenth century, the Court has stated that marriage is an essential institution (Getting 2013). According to Hurwitz (2004), “One implication is that there are good reasons for recognizing same-sex marriages, but other implications show that if the state does so, it should enact strong religious ties as well. While the struggle to gain equal matrimonial rights for same-sex marriages is changing, those ho call themselves “secular” continue to be caught in an uphill battle (Hackle, 2013). The second objection about why same sex marriage should be legal is because same sex couples can constitute a good based family; according to the American Academy of Pediatrics that has recognized that gay households can be just as loving and supportive an environment for raising children as the straight kind (Hackle, 2013).
Opponents believe gay parents will raise gay children because straight parents raise straight children. The ones who suffer the greatest repercussions of such prejudices are the children of gay and Sebastian couples. Same-sex couples have the privilege of adopting children to begin a family of their own. However, they are often rejected because of their unmarried status (Becker, 2012). The government directly discriminates against the children of same-sex marriages by not allowing them the same rights as children who have heterosexual parents.
Nevertheless it is not true because human sexual choice is both unchangeable and UN-chosen, and sexual orientation does not respond to social influences designed to lead it in a different direction. It is obvious that social change has not come without introverts (Getting, 2013). Also, many state and federal court cases that are under litigation demonstrate the debate over the definition of marriage remains unsettled. Although public support for same-sex relationships exists, bisexual women and men still encounter societal stereotypes (Hackle, 2013).
Yet, the claim that legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States is inevitable. Perhaps some rights can be obtained by same-sex couples through work with an attorney (Getting, 2013). Committed unions should be encouraged to enjoy legal and social aspects of choices in life styles. An overwhelming amount of research has been done showing that homosexuality is a political and cultural controversy, not just a legal one. Some Americans “favor allowing gay and lesbian couples to enter into legal agreements with each other, giving them many of the same rights as married couples” (Becker, 2012).
Throughout the last decade, the marriage equality has gained momentum, with President Beam’s endorsement of same-sex marriage in May 2012 being a significant historical moment for same-sex couples (Hackle, 2013). One of the most common problems that plague gay peoples that are denied the right to marry is their inability to claim their partners social security after he or she has died. The human Rights Campaign, which work to achieve equal rights for same-sex partners, is us porting the effort to attain survivor benefits for domesticate partners.
They believe, “any alteration to the Social Security system must include partners Of gays and lesbians in its definition Of survivor. ” In spite Of all the controversy over legalizing same-sex marriage, the balance bet”. ‘men religious freedom and nondiscrimination laws are in conflict. Since the institution reposes are changing and its boundaries are blurry, the option of marriage should be made legally available for all people. Also, among the parallels, both same-sex couples and religious believers claim that their conduct stems from commitments central to their identity (Hurwitz, 2004).
Although the right to marry, and to marry the person of one’s choice, is a fundamental right and necessary aspect of human happiness, it has been an explicitly stated “principle since the Court used its power of judicial review to strike down as unconstitutional a legislature’s definition of marriage in 1 967” (Getting, 013). It has been noted in some cases, the Court refused to interfere with the legislature’s power to regulate marriage. Marriage is considered “the most important relation in life” regardless of the choice of partners (Getting, 2013).
Current research attempts to bridge the gap of the impact of the institution of marriage and the state of marriage and family on public support for same-sex marriage, legal unions, and gay and lesbian couples raising children (Becker, 2012). Since civil unions or legal unions are predicated on extending legal rights to name-sex couples, it seems logical to suggest that married couples, regardless of their views on the same-sex marriage should at least be more in favor in extending these basic rights that they enjoy.
Finally, Americans must consider whether views on the purpose of marriage can moderate the influence of religious value on the support of same-sex marriage. Personally, as an American, my religious views do not condone same-sex marriage. It is my belief that press;Eng the sanctity of marriage as a union between one man and one woman should not be compromised by legalizing same-sex arraign. Also, same-sex relationships will result in a greater risk of health problems, such as AIDS, psychological disorders as well as a much lower life expectancy.