Site Loader

Evidenced based nursing, as we all know includes grounds available from research. This non merely helps in doing clinical determinations, but besides considers patients penchants and so helps to supply best possible attention ( Royle & A ; Blythe, 1998 ) . To utilize best available grounds from research, critical assessment is indispensable. Polit & A ; Hungler ( 1997 ) have denoted that critical assessment of research helps to play an of import function in the promotion of nursing cognition.

Harmonizing to Burns & A ; Grove ( 1997 ) , critical assessment broadens the apprehension and improves pattern of a nurse. The article, which the reader is traveling to review, is “Children ‘s histories of their pre-operative information needs” . Throughout the essay, the individual who is making the review will be called as reader and the writer of the article, which is being critiqued, will be called as research worker. The intent of the research was to “Explore the information demands of kids aged 7-11 old ages associating to planned admittance for surgery” .

The intent chiefly emphasizes on researching and placing the cognition of a group of kids, this indicates that really small is known about the phenomena ( Talbot, 1995 ) . Harmonizing to the readers, understanding this is an exploratory survey and exploratory survey do non utilize hypothesis. There is no hypothesis stated by the research worker. Researcher denotes that really small has been known about the phenomena and as there is no much information available sing this topic. Hence, in this instance hypothesis will non be formulated ( Burns & A ; Grove, 1997 ) .

Qualitative design does non prove any theory hence ; it does non turn to hypothesis ( Talbot, 1995 ) . This research includes wide inquiry, which is whether kids could place their ain information needs anterior to admittance for elected surgery. Question is being clearly defined because it has a survey group and cardinal construct. This wide inquiry could bring forth a wide reply and that will so assist the research worker to research in deepness. Harmonizing to Polit et Al ( 2001 ) , the research inquiry becomes more focussed as the research worker collects and analyse informations.

Reader strongly argues that this research is worthwhile because kids have their ain right to cognize sing their intervention and it is of import to see their positions earnestly while be aftering services and doing determinations ( Department of wellness, 2003 ) . This research will lend developing a proper tool to render information demands to kids in an appropriate manner. Very limited research has been done related to this subject. Furthermore, non all these research surveies included kids straight alternatively they have talked about parents and wellness attention professional ‘s positions instead than direct study from kids.

The research worker has discussed about other related subjects while be aftering this research. During this procedure, the research worker has managed to believe critically on the related subjects and has pulled out the struggles, incompatibilities, strengths and failing in the reappraisal of literature. The research worker has used most available literature while be aftering this research. Summary of the reappraisal on literature leads the reader to admit the importance of this research undertaking. The reappraisal of literature follows the intent of the survey ( LoBiondo-Wood & A ; Haber, 2002 ) .

The literature reappraisal of this peculiar research undertaking is up-to-date and comprehensive. The research worker has included all possible literature available related to this survey. This research was given for publication in twelvemonth 2004 and was published within a twelvemonth i. e. in twelvemonth 2005. Hence, it is up-to-date. The research worker has referenced the literature accurately by utilizing Harvard mention system ( Cormack, 1996 ) . Furthermore, it is easy available from the libraries. This research deals with the kids, their feelings, fright and concerns.

Reader believes that qualitative research design is the most appropriate to this peculiar research. Burns & A ; Grove ( 1997 ) argues that qualitative research seems to be a more effectual method of look intoing emotional responses, since human emotions are hard to quantify. Harmonizing to readers understanding in order to happen out kids ‘s ability to place their pre-operative information demands, this design should include methods like questioning or communicating, which is a portion of qualitative research method ( Talbot, 1995 ) .

Even through reappraisal of literature, it was important that really small is known about this phenomenon. Therefore, it is ideal to take qualitative design to analyze this topic in deepness ( Polit & A ; Hungler, 1997 ) . Other research design will non be suited for the survey of this phenomenon. Here the research worker is non taking to analyze the relationship between variables, moreover numerical informations will non assist to research the kids ‘s history of their pre-operative information demands ( Burns & A ; Grove, 1997 ) .

This research includes kids of age 7-11 old ages. The reader argues that kids of this age can non be pressurised to take portion in formal interviews, as they will non come out with their thoughts in pressurised apparatus. Where as in a non-threatening environment they feel free to show their positions and be given to be more friendly ( Cormack, 1996 ) . Researcher has obtained Ethical blessing from the Liverpool kids ‘s moralss commission. Ethical issues involved in this research have been addressed adequately.

The research worker has obtained consent from parents and verbal acquiescence from the kid prior to roll uping the information. Allmark ( 2002 ) has discussed about how parents consent maps to protect kid ‘s public assistance. Children belong to vulnerable group and they do non hold the competence to give their informed consent ( The royal college of nursing research society, 2003 ) . Researcher has given chance for both parents and kid to decline from take parting in the research ( LoBiondo-Wood & A ; Haber, 2002 ) . There is trouble in keeping confidentiality when little group is selected for research.

Burns & A ; Grove ( 2003 ) and Polit & A ; Hungler ( 1997 ) have discussed about troubles in keeping the namelessness of the participant. Even though the research worker held the participants as anon. and information was collected at place 1-2 hebdomads prior to the kid ‘s admittance. Reader strongly feels that in this instance namelessness is impossible to keep. When the information was collected at place, there is a greater invasion of privateness moreover ; presence of parents may act upon the information given by the kid ( Polit & A ; Hungler, 1997 ) .

Data was collected by utilizing write and draw technique with informal interview. Cormack ( 1996 ) has suggested that roll uping informations within natural state of affairs allows the kid to experience comfy and child tend to open up in well-meaning environment. Therefore, the information collected will be most important. In the research where the purpose was to research the information demands of kids this informal interviewing technique was used suitably. Informal conversations are more likely to take to friendly and natural treatment ( Ireland & A ; Holloway, 1996 ) .

During interview, the research worker used tape recording equipment at the same clip. This permits the research worker to detect all the hints, form or transition of address, which the research worker might hold missed, and assist to reexamine and understand decently during informations analysis ( Talbot, 1995 ) . Researcher allowed the kid to command the recording. Harmonizing to Mahon et Al ( 1996 ) , this increases the willingness and resonance and helps the kid to be more unfastened while replying inquiry.

The draw and write technique used is appropriate for the kids of this age group. Children find it hard to show their feelings for a alien verbally. Write and pull technique method offers insight into a kid ‘s experience and helps for treatment in deepness ( Hart & A ; Tyrer, 2006 ) . Reader thinks that it is hard to reason what the kid has drawn unless and until you ask the kid to explicate. Backett-Milburn and Mckie ( 1999 ) have argued that draw and compose technique fails to reflect the procedure involved in the building and aggregation of informations.

Punch ( 2002 ) besides suggests inquiring the kid to explicate what their drawing meant to them in order to analyze the informations. By inquiring wide inquiry, research worker has facilitated the kid to come out with inquiries and their demand to cognize about pre operative information demands. This has helped the research worker to roll up adequate information related to the research. As seen in the research subject it has been noticed that research worker has non discussed the attempts made to heighten the trustiness of the information.

Though the research worker has stated that this method of roll uping informations is relevant to this peculiar age group of kids, it is non been clearly explained, harmonizing to the standards to be followed to measure the credibleness, dependableness, transferability and conformability of the informations ( Lincoln and Guba 1985, cited by Polit et al 2001 ) . For the deduction of the research findings in pattern, obtaining cogency and dependability of the method is really indispensable ( Holloway & A ; Wheeler, 2002 ) .

The research worker has selected a sample of nine kids of age 7-11 old ages, who have ne’er been admitted to the research worker ‘s work topographic point. The sample was chosen on purposive standards. The kids were recruited from the proposed theatre list of sawbones of assorted specializers, including twenty-four hours instance and prolonged stay patients. There was considerable self-selection from the 40 households invited to take part. Researcher has selected participants harmonizing to the demand of the survey ( Morse 1991, cited by Coyne 1997 ) .

Burns and Grove ( 1997 ) besides suggest taking the sample from selected population that meets the standards. In this qualitative research, reader agrees that little sample will supply accurate information. The research worker will be able to concentrate in deepness and can give accurate and meaningful findings ( Patton 1990, cited by Coyne 1997 ) . When there is big sum of verbal informations must be analysed which is besides more intensive and time-consuming, little sample is convenient ( Sandelowski 1986, cited by LoBiondo-Wood and Haber 2002 ) .

Harmonizing to Talbot ( 1995 ) little sample gives rise to bias while generalising the consequences on chosen population. The little sample is handpicked and hence it has limited ability to generalise. It is hard to state whether the remainder of the population will besides give the same information. In add-on, if this method is applied for other population with same age group of different civilization and who already have experienced infirmary stay, may give different information.

The informations gathered from the interview and write and draw technique was analysed by utilizing five distinguishable stages. They are familiarization, placing a thematic model, Indexing, Charting, Mapping, and reading. Researcher has explained the analysis procedure superficially. Data analyses lead to development of three subjects. These subjects explain in item what the kids knew about their admittances, how they got information and what they wanted to cognize. These subjects are appropriate to the intent of the research.

The decision of this survey focuses on kids ‘s ability to sketch their current cognition and inquiries about their extroverted admittance. Researcher concludes the research by stating that kids of 7-11 old ages can place their ain information demands. Furthermore, some kids had really small information about their forthcoming surgery and none of them had received information straight from wellness professionals or kids ‘s infirmary, which they were to be admitted. The consequences drawn from this research work drives the reader to hold that it has answered the original inquiry.

Few recommendations have been made by the research worker for farther research to research the information demands of kids from different cultural background and to prove the most appropriate method of presenting information to kids. These recommendations are worthwhile to move upon because there are kids with wider age scope and different cultural background undergo surgery everyday. It is non practical to believe that they get accurate information from their parents or other beginnings.

Reader comes across many kids get downing from the age of 3-16 old ages who attend preadmission clinic everyday. In add-on, it is deserving giving information to kids harmonizing to their age and degree of understanding ( Rushforth, 1999 ) . In this research, the research worker has spoken about kids from 7-11 old ages of age. Then what about the remainder of the kids? Reader feels that running the preadmissions clinics will be utile merely if they give proper information to kids harmonizing to their age and harmonizing to their degree of apprehension.

This research has its ain strengths and restrictions. In the beginning, reader battles to understand the purposes and aims because harmonizing to the research methodological analysis the purposes and aims should be explained at the beginning, whereas in this research it has been explained in ulterior pages. The research worker has done a good reappraisal of literature and theoretical underpinning. However, when the research is been carried out the method used to garner information from kids has some insufficiency.

It is non certain weather the consequences can be generalized on the whole population. Data analysis is non been explained clearly. Consequences drawn from this research is easy to follow and recommendations made for farther survey is deserving sing. Evidenced based nursing, as we all know includes grounds available from research. This non merely helps in doing clinical determinations, but besides considers patients penchants and so helps to supply best possible attention ( Royle & A ; Blythe, 1998 ) . To utilize best available grounds from research, critical assessment is indispensable.

Polit & A ; Hungler ( 1997 ) have denoted that critical assessment of research helps to play an of import function in the promotion of nursing cognition. Harmonizing to Burns & A ; Grove ( 1997 ) , critical assessment broadens the apprehension and improves pattern of a nurse. The article, which the reader is traveling to review, is “Children ‘s histories of their pre-operative information needs” . Throughout the essay, the individual who is making the review will be called as reader and the writer of the article, which is being critiqued, will be called as research worker.

The intent of the research was to “Explore the information demands of kids aged 7-11 old ages associating to planned admittance for surgery” . The intent chiefly emphasizes on researching and placing the cognition of a group of kids, this indicates that really small is known about the phenomena ( Talbot, 1995 ) . Harmonizing to the readers, understanding this is an exploratory survey and exploratory survey do non utilize hypothesis. There is no hypothesis stated by the research worker. Researcher denotes that really small has been known about the phenomena and as there is no much information available sing this topic.

Hence, in this instance hypothesis will non be formulated ( Burns & A ; Grove, 1997 ) . Qualitative design does non prove any theory hence ; it does non turn to hypothesis ( Talbot, 1995 ) . This research includes wide inquiry, which is whether kids could place their ain information needs anterior to admittance for elected surgery. Question is being clearly defined because it has a survey group and cardinal construct. This wide inquiry could bring forth a wide reply and that will so assist the research worker to research in deepness.

Harmonizing to Polit et Al ( 2001 ) , the research inquiry becomes more focussed as the research worker collects and analyse informations. Reader strongly argues that this research is worthwhile because kids have their ain right to cognize sing their intervention and it is of import to see their positions earnestly while be aftering services and doing determinations ( Department of wellness, 2003 ) . This research will lend developing a proper tool to render information demands to kids in an appropriate manner. Very limited research has been done related to this subject.

Furthermore, non all these research surveies included kids straight alternatively they have talked about parents and wellness attention professional ‘s positions instead than direct study from kids. The research worker has discussed about other related subjects while be aftering this research. During this procedure, the research worker has managed to believe critically on the related subjects and has pulled out the struggles, incompatibilities, strengths and failing in the reappraisal of literature. The research worker has used most available literature while be aftering this research.

Summary of the reappraisal on literature leads the reader to admit the importance of this research undertaking. The reappraisal of literature follows the intent of the survey ( LoBiondo-Wood & A ; Haber, 2002 ) . The literature reappraisal of this peculiar research undertaking is up-to-date and comprehensive. The research worker has included all possible literature available related to this survey. This research was given for publication in twelvemonth 2004 and was published within a twelvemonth i. e. in twelvemonth 2005.

Hence, it is up-to-date. The research worker has referenced the literature accurately by utilizing Harvard mention system ( Cormack, 1996 ) . Furthermore, it is easy available from the libraries. This research deals with the kids, their feelings, fright and concerns. Reader believes that qualitative research design is the most appropriate to this peculiar research. Burns & A ; Grove ( 1997 ) argues that qualitative research seems to be a more effectual method of look intoing emotional responses, since human emotions are hard to quantify.

Harmonizing to readers understanding in order to happen out kids ‘s ability to place their pre-operative information demands, this design should include methods like questioning or communicating, which is a portion of qualitative research method ( Talbot, 1995 ) . Even through reappraisal of literature, it was important that really small is known about this phenomenon. Therefore, it is ideal to take qualitative design to analyze this topic in deepness ( Polit & A ; Hungler, 1997 ) . Other research design will non be suited for the survey of this phenomenon.

Here the research worker is non taking to analyze the relationship between variables, moreover numerical informations will non assist to research the kids ‘s history of their pre-operative information demands ( Burns & A ; Grove, 1997 ) . This research includes kids of age 7-11 old ages. The reader argues that kids of this age can non be pressurised to take portion in formal interviews, as they will non come out with their thoughts in pressurised apparatus. Where as in a non-threatening environment they feel free to show their positions and be given to be more friendly ( Cormack, 1996 ) .

Researcher has obtained Ethical blessing from the Liverpool kids ‘s moralss commission. Ethical issues involved in this research have been addressed adequately. The research worker has obtained consent from parents and verbal acquiescence from the kid prior to roll uping the information. Allmark ( 2002 ) has discussed about how parents consent maps to protect kid ‘s public assistance. Children belong to vulnerable group and they do non hold the competence to give their informed consent ( The royal college of nursing research society, 2003 ) .

Researcher has given chance for both parents and kid to decline from take parting in the research ( LoBiondo-Wood & A ; Haber, 2002 ) . There is trouble in keeping confidentiality when little group is selected for research. Burns & A ; Grove ( 2003 ) and Polit & A ; Hungler ( 1997 ) have discussed about troubles in keeping the namelessness of the participant. Even though the research worker held the participants as anon. and information was collected at place 1-2 hebdomads prior to the kid ‘s admittance. Reader strongly feels that in this instance namelessness is impossible to keep.

When the information was collected at place, there is a greater invasion of privateness moreover ; presence of parents may act upon the information given by the kid ( Polit & A ; Hungler, 1997 ) . Data was collected by utilizing write and draw technique with informal interview. Cormack ( 1996 ) has suggested that roll uping informations within natural state of affairs allows the kid to experience comfy and child tend to open up in well-meaning environment. Therefore, the information collected will be most important.

In the research where the purpose was to research the information demands of kids this informal interviewing technique was used suitably. Informal conversations are more likely to take to friendly and natural treatment ( Ireland & A ; Holloway, 1996 ) . During interview, the research worker used tape recording equipment at the same clip. This permits the research worker to detect all the hints, form or transition of address, which the research worker might hold missed, and assist to reexamine and understand decently during informations analysis ( Talbot, 1995 ) .

Researcher allowed the kid to command the recording. Harmonizing to Mahon et Al ( 1996 ) , this increases the willingness and resonance and helps the kid to be more unfastened while replying inquiry. The draw and write technique used is appropriate for the kids of this age group. Children find it hard to show their feelings for a alien verbally. Write and pull technique method offers insight into a kid ‘s experience and helps for treatment in deepness ( Hart & A ; Tyrer, 2006 ) . Reader thinks that it is hard to reason what the kid has drawn unless and until you ask the kid to explicate.

Backett-Milburn and Mckie ( 1999 ) have argued that draw and compose technique fails to reflect the procedure involved in the building and aggregation of informations. Punch ( 2002 ) besides suggests inquiring the kid to explicate what their drawing meant to them in order to analyze the informations. By inquiring wide inquiry, research worker has facilitated the kid to come out with inquiries and their demand to cognize about pre operative information demands. This has helped the research worker to roll up adequate information related to the research.

As seen in the research subject it has been noticed that research worker has non discussed the attempts made to heighten the trustiness of the information. Though the research worker has stated that this method of roll uping informations is relevant to this peculiar age group of kids, it is non been clearly explained, harmonizing to the standards to be followed to measure the credibleness, dependableness, transferability and conformability of the informations ( Lincoln and Guba 1985, cited by Polit et al 2001 ) .

For the deduction of the research findings in pattern, obtaining cogency and dependability of the method is really indispensable ( Holloway & A ; Wheeler, 2002 ) . The research worker has selected a sample of nine kids of age 7-11 old ages, who have ne’er been admitted to the research worker ‘s work topographic point. The sample was chosen on purposive standards. The kids were recruited from the proposed theatre list of sawbones of assorted specializers, including twenty-four hours instance and prolonged stay patients.

There was considerable self-selection from the 40 households invited to take part. Researcher has selected participants harmonizing to the demand of the survey ( Morse 1991, cited by Coyne 1997 ) . Burns and Grove ( 1997 ) besides suggest taking the sample from selected population that meets the standards. In this qualitative research, reader agrees that little sample will supply accurate information. The research worker will be able to concentrate in deepness and can give accurate and meaningful findings ( Patton 1990, cited by Coyne 1997 ) .

When there is big sum of verbal informations must be analysed which is besides more intensive and time-consuming, little sample is convenient ( Sandelowski 1986, cited by LoBiondo-Wood and Haber 2002 ) . Harmonizing to Talbot ( 1995 ) little sample gives rise to bias while generalising the consequences on chosen population. The little sample is handpicked and hence it has limited ability to generalise. It is hard to state whether the remainder of the population will besides give the same information.

In add-on, if this method is applied for other population with same age group of different civilization and who already have experienced infirmary stay, may give different information. The informations gathered from the interview and write and draw technique was analysed by utilizing five distinguishable stages. They are familiarization, placing a thematic model, Indexing, Charting, Mapping, and reading. Researcher has explained the analysis procedure superficially.

Data analyses lead to development of three subjects. These subjects explain in item what the kids knew about their admittances, how they got information and what they wanted to cognize. These subjects are appropriate to the intent of the research. The decision of this survey focuses on kids ‘s ability to sketch their current cognition and inquiries about their extroverted admittance. Researcher concludes the research by stating that kids of 7-11 old ages can place their ain information demands.

Furthermore, some kids had really small information about their forthcoming surgery and none of them had received information straight from wellness professionals or kids ‘s infirmary, which they were to be admitted. The consequences drawn from this research work drives the reader to hold that it has answered the original inquiry. Few recommendations have been made by the research worker for farther research to research the information demands of kids from different cultural background and to prove the most appropriate method of presenting information to kids.

These recommendations are worthwhile to move upon because there are kids with wider age scope and different cultural background undergo surgery everyday. It is non practical to believe that they get accurate information from their parents or other beginnings. Reader comes across many kids get downing from the age of 3-16 old ages who attend preadmission clinic everyday. In add-on, it is deserving giving information to kids harmonizing to their age and degree of understanding ( Rushforth, 1999 ) . In this research, the research worker has spoken about kids from 7-11 old ages of age.

Then what about the remainder of the kids? Reader feels that running the preadmissions clinics will be utile merely if they give proper information to kids harmonizing to their age and harmonizing to their degree of apprehension. This research has its ain strengths and restrictions. In the beginning, reader battles to understand the purposes and aims because harmonizing to the research methodological analysis the purposes and aims should be explained at the beginning, whereas in this research it has been explained in ulterior pages.

The research worker has done a good reappraisal of literature and theoretical underpinning. However, when the research is been carried out the method used to garner information from kids has some insufficiency. It is non certain weather the consequences can be generalized on the whole population. Data analysis is non been explained clearly. Consequences drawn from this research is easy to follow and recommendations made for farther survey is deserving sing.

Post Author: admin